Since events have unfolded one fateful day in mid (14th)December last year pertaining to the ‘senseless deaths of 20 children’ and six adults and the purported shooter, Adam Lanza, a troubled 20 year old man at his own hands questions have begun to be raised as to whether the Sandy Hook Elementary school massacre was actually at the hands of Lanza alone or even to what degree he was involved if at all.
Strange I know but the evidence and the documentaries starting to make their way are compelling to say the least and present the idea that there may in fact be much more going on that meets the eye and that the general media has on some level has been used to corroborate a preferred view that it was all the work of a lone madman which has thus inspired the active decision to have gun right possession laws challenged in the US.
ringsidereport: Like the 9/11 attacks and conspiracy theories that surround it, this tragedy began to sprout similar things, but what motive would the machine the runs the country have with the deaths of children? Well, gun control is being pointed to, and the behavior of those that are pushing for it is disgusting. The continued photo opportunities for President Obama mixed with his wiping away of no tears as he demanded gun control is sickening. I’m not a gun owner, but the people that are demanding the public handing them over don’t seem to realize that when you take away one right, you are moving onto others. It will be the first brick in the road.
First of let me say that I am not arguing that the murders did not happen. They obviously did, but the question we folk in the media ought to ask is were there other individuals involved and why has this particular tragedy struck such a lurid verve with the community and a rallying cry to rid citizens of guns? Then again maybe curtailing gun ownership might be the right thing after all if we are to look at the rate of violent incidence in other comparable industrialized nations. Then again perhaps living in the US is a violent experience to begin with whether we like it or not.
Reading ringside’s report the article goes on to note peculiar reactions from parents and officials that perhaps ought to give us pause and wonder? Or maybe it’s just all wishful thinking?
Argues the report: To those that will contend that the government would not use deception or a tragedy like this to get what they wanted, and the idea of using actors and actresses is absurd.
Which poses the question how absurd and are we really to believe the state actively planned this in order to push its agenda and the leeway to other prohibitive agenda? Or is that just wishful thinking because we all know we live in a transparent society where no secrets exist and that we all have equal access to information? Which of course raises the question what information or news ends up getting disseminated and filtered in our society and what are we suppose to actually believe?
The history of propaganda that is planted into the news is documented and it is more prevalent now than ever before. The questions that surround Sandy Hook should be addressed and should it be discovered that actors have been paid or recruited to play the roles of grieving family members, those hiring them should be called on it. I don’t think that there is any dispute that children were killed that day, but with what weapon and the number of shooters are questionable. At this point, all theories should be scrutinized and either dismissed or validated without backlash from those that believe everything that they hear and refuse to entertain any other notion outside of what the man on the newscast told him. Sift through the nonsense.
Reflects the examiner: When one actually dares to dive into all of the evidence that exists surrounding these events, it’s obvious none of them were the work of a single individual and all of them have the telltale signs of a sophisticated operation that likely requires a trained team of individuals working in concert. Unfortunately, that team also includes members of the media, at the highest levels, that are ultimately responsible for what the rest of us are fed as perceived “reality.” Local and lesser news agencies merely parrot and support the information that emerges.
And this from reddit:
Serious question, how do we know he even went to Sandy Hook? There are no eyewitnesses, no camera footage, no independent evidence of a body (unless someone has a picture?), no autopsy, no confirmed cause of death, no car belonging to him or anyone who knew him that could have taken him there.
And who identified the body as Adam Lanza, and how were they able to do it so quickly? If Adam Lanza’s body is at Sandy Hook, did someone (eg Chris Rodia) deposit his dead body at the school?
All we have is “official sources” saying they found Ryan Lanza’s ID on a dead body.
My guess is some group grabbed him, killed his mother, dressed him up like the actual shooter, then massacred the kids, shot Lanza – the patsy – and ran before the cops got there. If Adam shot the kids then shot himself, how did the assault rifle get in the car truck? Does it make sense he’d do the massacre inside, go outside and put the gun in the car, then go back in and kill himself? Do we get all neat and tidy about stowing our gun before we suicide?