Revelations that Kristen Stewart has been involved with Rupert Sanders greater than 6 months point to the notion that the two indeed did have conjugal relations despite Ms Stewart’s claim’s that their dalliance was a one off….
If I simply kiss another man behind my hunk boyfriend’s back am I cheating? What about if I have sex but still tell my hunk boyfriend he means the world to me?
With the revelation that Kristen Stewart and Rupert Sanders were carrying on behind each other’s respective partner’s back it has become imperative for both parties to try and salvage their public credibility as shock and disbelief from a betrayed public mount.
To what degree the two were engaging each other might be anyone’s guess, but what is for sure is that they are both fast being made to look irresponsible, callous and at best indifferent. In Ms Stewart’s case her credibility has taken a real nose dive as she is now being painted as just another floozy who never deserved the ‘gorgeous’ well meaning Robert Pattinson whilst Sanders himself is equally getting a savage beating for his indiscretions (never mind that these are two adults who have the right to choose as they wish, they are public figures whose every move is watched, and even more so now….).
With that knowledge above it should hardly surprise us to find out that ‘sources’ (such an intangible word, who are these mystery sources?) are now describing the dalliance between Stewart and Sanders as a flighty momentary indiscretion where in capital letters, NO SEX EVER TOOK PLACE.
Hmm, of course whether these two actually had sex or not can not be proven, but rest assured reporters are paying close attention to past photos of the two for any hints. In fact according to assertions by unindentified sources that their affair was just a momentary lapse do not fly too well considering the release of photos (see below) of the pair dining together on May 15 at Monsieur Vuong restaurant in Berlin, Germany, where it is said the two could barely take their eyes off each other. Indeed….
Then there’s this statement via Rupert Sander’s father, Michael who has spoken out in an effort to try and downplay the affair.
“From what I gather nothing really happened and it is all a lot of fuss about nothing. I should imagine it was something very brief,” he told People. “She is a very pretty girl and when you work that closely with someone for so long, sometimes things happen.”
Yes Michael. Things do happen, it’s just the public want to know how much did ‘things’ happen before they necessarily drop their idol for a new one or not….
How interesting then that in a matter of days In a matter of days one of the world’s highest paid actresses/celebrities has gone from demi god status to that of untouchabele floozy. From idolized can’t do no wrong, to everything that is wrong, from virtuous beauty that we could not take our eyes from to little tramp who would do whatever she needed to get hers. Whether she actually had sex with Rupert or not doesn’t even matter anymore, she’s the tarnished ‘village slut’ that’s all, which in some sad way says a lot about how we value our women: perfect, flawless, gorgeous, loyal or completely damned!
Here are some comments below I came across the web that might shed some light how Ms Stewart is currently being perceived and what in part this suggests about Hollywood heroes who take on acting roles beyond those assigned to them by the public:
What actually matters here is her lack of integrity and self absorption that translates more into a faulty character and less about age or how young she is. Kristen Stewart presents herself publicly as a self-centered and moderately talented actress who, in this case, has intentionally chosen to self indulge in a way that was and is emotionally and professionally hurtful to her boyfriend, friends, co-workers and industry folks tied to the 2 films: SWATH & the Twilight Saga.
Kristen Stewart is limited in her range as an actress and she hasn’t yet learned how to tap into the wealth of human emotion and experience that many actors her age already have. Yes, we can sight her young age as a major factor in her “lapse” of judgement. I say that’s crap-Kristen Stewart simply doesn’t deserve all this hype as she hasn’t contributed anything that major culturally or artistically. Kristen Stewart played herself, playing Bella in Twilight. Kristen Stewart is stuck in mediocrity, lapses in judgement and hurtful self-absorbed behavior. There are so many talented young actors in this country that deserve our attention and Kristen Stewart is clearly not among them.
As far as I’m concerned, this entire media frenzy is nothing more than an attempt to use anything which comes to hand to vilify and smear Ms. Stewart, whom the media has cordially despised almost from the beginning of her acting career, notwithstanding the observable fact that she is clearly one of the finest actors of her generation. The media has always hated her, and made their hatred plain, because she has consistently refused to fit herself, and her private life most of all, into some kind of pre-packaged Hollywood mold, and has been consistently outspoken even to the point of being blunt when she does choose to speak out. She has refused to protray herself, or to allow herself to be portrayed, as the kind of brainless bimbo type of Hollywood personality which the media expects and is comfortable with, especially where young women are concerned, for which I applaud her.
they did not had sex. just kissing. ok it was wrong and a mistake. we agree with that. but seriously the tabloid are a bunch of hypocrite because so much more has happened, than a young naive girl making out with another man in hollywood. her case is worst peanuts compared the other juicy scandals that had already happened in hollywood. but most of all she shows a lot of strenght by apologizing publicly and coming clear. a lot of hollywood stars would have denyed or said nothing or even lied to protect themself from the public opinion. she do not deserves the lashing out against her, she was really brave to face the situation and try to fix things up. but what i really did not understand is the director has escaped the blame. he was the one who was married with kids, he has not even been mentioned. he is the one who the public opinion should lash out. kstew is just the scapegoat of the tabloids who are trying to build a scandal on a making out session to sell more paper.
I just don’t understand why she keeps getting parts. Half the girls in my high school were better looking than her, and most were obese. Every actress in my intro to theater class in college was better than her. She’s only where she is because of her parents connections. She’s like the W. Bush of acting.
The only reason Kristen is getting most of the heat is because she’s famous and he (Rupert Sanders) is not. Personally, they are equally guilty for what they did. Some people say that Rupert is more guilty because he’s married with kids, but Kristen made the choice to sleep with a married man with kids. She’s not innocent here, nor should she be “left alone”. Should her career suffer from this? No, but then again I don’t care that much for her career at all because I think she’s a terrible actress, but that’s a different story. Also, can we please stop excusing her behavior because she’s young? There are plenty of young people who would not do what Kristen did. To lump 20 somethings all together like this is insulting. Kristen did this not because she is young but because she’s immature and selfish. Same goes for Rupert.
Slow news day…
The next Lindsay Lohan…….