Proposed Arizona shame a slut law aims to discipline women who wish to use their employers to be a floozy.

Proposed Arizona shame a slut law aims to discipline women who wish to use their employers to be a floozy.

Ladies. Are you a slut?

Being a woman in Arizona America just got a little bit more complicated this week. Never mind as long as you are not a slut everything will work out just fine for you. Or maybe not…

Well first we had Rush Limbaugh mouthing off how irresponsible and slutty it was for female college students wishing to get the state to pay for prescription pills, now it’s the state of Arizona’s turn to join in the hating of women too, cause they now have a wonderful proposed law up their sleeve that will finally put all them women in place. The only question of course is what took so long?

jezebel: A proposed new law in Arizona would give employers the power to request that women being prescribed birth control pills provide proof that they’re using it for non-sexual reasons. And because Arizona’s an at-will employment state, that means that bosses critical of their female employees’ sex lives could fire them as a result.

Kids, let’s be honest. Like me you must be foaming at the mouth. A way to finally call a spade a spade and get women to own up how as to how slutty they really are? Really one has to wonder about the audacity of all them women wishing to get their employers to pay for their prescription pill all so they can have cost free orgasms.

But how did this magic come about to this part of sunshine?

Yesterday, a Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed Republican Debbie Lesko’s HB2625 by a vote of 6-2, which would allow an employer to request proof that a woman using insurance to buy birth control was being prescribed the birth control for reasons other than not wanting to get pregnant. It’s all about freedom, she said, echoing everyone who thinks there’s nothing ironic about claiming that a country that’s “free” allows people’s bosses to dictate what medical care is available to them through insurance.

Geez there’s that first word again- first amendment. Are we to believe women actually have constitutional rights? Last time I looked they were all doled out half naked on magazine covers teaching the world how to give their man orgasms. At least that’s something the state of Arizona would support right? No man should be denied sexual satisfaction and if we have to all chip in to make sure he does I say better him than her. Well at least the state of Arizona thinks that because invading a woman’s privacy and getting her to tell us if she’s a slut or not is something we can all wink away and not have to bother addressing with them. Sluts, whores? Not in my backyard thank you very much!

But the plot thickens….

Further, Lesko states, with a straight face, that this bill is necessary because “we live in America; we don’t live in the Soviet Union.”

Soviet Union? Surely they too must have a policy of intimidating or at least subjugating women to policies that make sense for fat old white men who drive nearly beat up BMW’s?  Or maybe they don’t even have cars in Russia, but that’s besides the point, no one is free in Russia, so we here in America should count our lucky stars that we have legislators like the ones we have in the state of Arizona who are making sure them women don’t get one over their employers or worse, us taxpayers.

And just to give you the shudders comes this courtesy of Planned Parenthood Arizona President Bryan Howard who opposes any bill against the accessibility of women’s health care in Arizona.

“The bill is part of the assault on women’s health care across the country.”

Really? Can President Bryan Howard be on to something here kids? And this too:

statepressFather John Muir, a priest at the All Saints Catholic Newman Center on the Tempe campus, said the controversial issue is not about birth control, but religious freedom and the First Amendment.

“It’s not about birth control,” Muir said. “It’s about the right to live out your beliefs and principles without inference by the state.”

Live your life according to your own principles, not be concerned about state politics, or what fat old white men think about you being a slut or not? Hmm, now that’s an interesting concept. I wonder how that’s catching on in Russia?

Isn’t it time we just shoved the entire female species off the cliff and finally be done with them,? Only in Arizona where sexist dreams are at the forefront….

From Around the Web
  • Anonymous

    Religions need to adapt and accommodate.
    Jehovah’s Witnesses blood transfusion confusion

    Jehovahs Witnesses take blood products now in 2012.
    They take all fractions of blood.This includes hemoglobin, albumin, clotting factors, cryosupernatant and cryopoor too, and many, many, others.
    If one adds up all the blood fractions the JWs takes, it equals a whole unit of blood. Any, many of these fractions are made from thousands upon thousands of units of donated blood.
    Jehovah’s Witnesses can take Bovine *cows blood* as long as it is euphemistically called synthetic Hemopure.
    Jehovah’s Witnesses now accept every fraction of blood except the membrane of the red blood cell. JWs now accept blood transfusions.
    The fact that the JW blood issue is so unclear is downright dangerous in the emergency room.

    Danny Haszard