Source: NYT's.
Last year the New York Times published an article about a group called ‘Ivy Plus Society,’ essentially an Ivy league network for Ivy league graduates to get together and share like minded interests. What the Times of course didn’t disclose is the private emails in this journal’s possession about the ulterior reasons as to why the highly acclaimed ‘club’ was begun to begin with.
If one thing can be discerned from the private emails between the anonymous party and the author of this post (displayed below) is the fact that the founder of the organization, a Ms Jennifer Wilde Anderson according to the inside source was to simply and shamelessly meet Ivy league men and the trust fund men worth seven figures and plus. This it seems is the real reason why the club came about and that everything else was smoke screens. Which begs the question what does attending Ivy League really mean and why are we still creating illusions of all inclusiveness when in fact many examples point to the calculated behavior of many individuals who are simply interested in the select benefits of the Ivy league mantra and the wealth that comes with. A hustler’s game one wonders…
Evidence 1:
How unfortunate for the anthroplogy student that Ms Anderson’s affections weren’t aimed at his mind or choice of vocation or interests but rather at his purported grand wealth. As for Susan McShane being concerned with her alias, one begs the question why would she want to remain friendly with this group, for even she understands the callous and primal needs of Ms Anderson, the instigating individual? Why? But before we answer that question, we ought to tell you what in fact ended up happening to Ms Anderson…
ps- this is the blog Susan McShane is referring to- to be candid it elicited a lot of nasty reactions.
It’s confirmed. You are only desirable as long as you are a pedigree plus.
